Export limit exceeded: 425757 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425757 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425757 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (425757 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-9661 | 2026-11-13 | 7 High | ||
| Poste Italiane Postecert FIRMAOK! 1.6.29 on Windows contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability caused by an uncontrolled OpenSSL search path, where launcher.exe and dependent executables such as updater.exe and tslupdater.exe load OpenSSL configuration and library files from a hardcoded, user-writable directory that does not exist by default. A low-privileged local attacker can create this missing directory and place malicious OpenSSL configuration or library files inside it, causing the application to load and execute attacker-controlled code with the privileges of the user running it, enabling horizontal or, when a higher-privileged user runs the application, vertical privilege escalation up to full system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70640 | 2 Ggml, Ggml-org | 2 Llama.cpp, Llama.cpp | 2026-11-13 | 7 High |
| llama.cpp builds b1886 through b7445 contain a race condition use-after-free vulnerability in the LLaMA-Android JNI wrapper where bench_1model() and free_1context() lack synchronization, allowing Thread A to operate on freed memory while Thread B concurrently frees the llama_context. Attackers can exploit this by performing heap spray with attacker-controlled data containing a fake vtable to hijack the vtable pointer at offset +0x30, causing llama_batch_allocr::clear() to dereference arbitrary memory and achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-128087 | 1 Eugeny | 1 Russh | 2026-11-13 | 3.7 Low |
| russh is a Rust SSH client and server library that includes an SSH agent protocol implementation. From version 0.55.0 until version 0.65.1, the initial key exchange invokes client::Handler::kex_done() with the raw shared secret before check_server_key() accepts the server host key or certificate. A malicious SSH server can therefore trigger application-defined secondary-channel initialization or early data handling even when the server identity is subsequently rejected. Ordinary clients that keep the callback's no-op default or independently defer callback-derived actions until trust is confirmed are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 0.65.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110331 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els | 2026-11-13 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in abrt. The completeness check introduced to mitigate CVE-2026-54228 and CVE-2026-54229 only verifies that a dump directory contains a "count" element, which an unprivileged user can create. This allows a local attacker to bypass the guard and again poison elements in, or seize ownership of, dump directories while privileged ABRT handlers are processing them. Related Problems2 mutating methods remain ungated by the same check. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110330 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els | 2026-11-13 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in abrt. abrt-server trusts a client-supplied PID when creating problem dumps over abrt.socket and, running as root, copies that process's /proc data (including environ) into a dump directory owned by the connecting unprivileged user. This allows a local attacker to read environment variables and related metadata of other users' or root processes when abrtd is running. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55309 | 2026-11-13 | 8.4 High | ||
| In multiple functions of verifier.rs, there is a possible way to bypass secure boot signature verification via fault injection due to a logic error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55311 | 2026-11-13 | 8.4 High | ||
| In N/A of gdmc/gsp/project/gdmc.mk, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55312 | 2026-11-13 | 7.8 High | ||
| In insert_node of remap.c, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write in the address remapping table due to a non-heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55316 | 2026-11-13 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| In handle_dpm_image of seclib.rs, there is a possible Logic error due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55319 | 2026-11-13 | 8.4 High | ||
| In thread_free of thread.c, there is a possible way to corrupt kernel heap metadata on thread creation failure due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55321 | 2026-11-13 | 7.8 High | ||
| In parse_prime256v1 of keymint_asn1.c, there is a possible Heap Buffer Overflow due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56938 | 2026-11-13 | 7.0 High | ||
| In port_shutdown of ipc.c, there is a possible Use After Free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56980 | 2026-11-13 | 8.4 High | ||
| In createDataFlowAsync of data_flow_manager.cc, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds write in shared memory due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57005 | 2026-11-13 | 8.8 High | ||
| In EuiccPort.buildUiccAccessRule of EuiccPort.java, there is a possible Confused Deputy due to a confused deputy. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57037 | 2026-11-13 | 8.4 High | ||
| In getChppAppState of chpp_init.cc, there is a possible way to trigger an out of bounds read and corrupt task control structures due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58680 | 2026-11-13 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| In cpm_mbox_power_ctrl_sswrp of cpm_mbox.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a precondition check failure. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58781 | 2026-11-13 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| In HostLinkBase::chreIpiHandler of host_link.cc, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58782 | 2026-11-13 | 6.2 Medium | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58791 | 2026-11-13 | 7.8 High | ||
| In pic_timing of hevc_decoder, there is a possible Non-Heap Buffer Overflow due to a buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with execution privileges needed. User interaction is for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-129092 | 1 Ccc-attestation | 1 Attested-tls-poc | 2026-11-13 | 5.7 Medium |
| CCC Attestation SIG attested-tls-poc through commit 731ca82 contains a time-of-check time-of-use vulnerability because Evidence is appraised only once during the TLS handshake, without post-handshake re-attestation. Attackers with local access to the attesting endpoint can alter workload code, data, configuration, or attached devices like GPUs while peers keep trusting the original Evidence. | ||||