Export limit exceeded: 424751 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424751 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424751 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (424751 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-67543 | 2026-11-11 | 8.8 High | ||
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, heym hardens one untrusted-code path but not its sibling. The Python tool executor (python_tool_executor.py) treats user code as untrusted and mandates a Docker sandbox (no network, read-only fs, non-root, no docker socket), failing closed. The skill executor (skill_python_executor.py) runs skill Python via a local backend subprocess with no Docker isolation — only a 512 MB RLIMIT and a 7-key env denylist — so a skill executes inside the backend execution context, with filesystem access, network egress, and non-denylisted environment variables that should not be exposed to untrusted/shared skills. In the shipped Docker config (backend runs as root + /var/run/docker.sock mounted), this escalates to host root. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67542 | 2026-11-11 | 7.1 High | ||
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, POST /api/mcp/fetch-tools is reachable by any authenticated user (lowest role; no admin/workflow association) and fetches an attacker-supplied URL through the sse and streamable_http transports with no scheme / private-IP / allowlist / redirect guard. The transport error is reflected in the HTTP 422 response, giving a semi-blind SSRF oracle, and the attacker also controls the outbound request headers. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67541 | 2026-11-11 | 8.1 High | ||
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, team-member management (add / remove / update) is gated only on team membership, not on the team creator/admin role — and TeamMember has no role column. Any non-creator member can seat an attacker account into the team; because credential team-shares are scoped only by TeamMember.user_id, the newly-added attacker can then decrypt every credential shared into that team (provider API keys, OAuth tokens. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67540 | 2026-11-11 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Heym builds and runs agentic systems and business-process automations on self-hosted infrastructure. Prior to version 0.0.70, get_workflow_template / get_node_template fetches a template by ID with no visibility / author / shared_with predicate, so any authenticated user can read (and use) any other tenant's private (visibility=specific_users) template — including its full node/edge graph and the email addresses it was shared with. The list endpoint enforces visibility correctly; the single-item get/use paths do not. This issue has been patched in version 0.0.70. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103038 | 1 Streamsoft | 1 Pingtools Network Utilities | 2026-11-11 | N/A |
| PingTools Network Utilities 4.64 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the Host field of a Watcher ICMP service. The application appends the attacker-controlled Host value to a ping command, serializes the command as a single string, and executes it through sh -c. A local attacker who can create or modify a Watcher service can inject shell syntax and execute arbitrary commands with the PingTools application UID and its granted Android permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126262 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2026-11-11 | 9.3 Critical |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiAnalyzer 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiAnalyzer 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiAnalyzer 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.12 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who has access to the oftp port to execute code or command on the system via crafted OFTP packets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126259 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2026-11-11 | 9 Critical |
| A missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.12, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.13 may allow an unauthenticated attacker with HA FGSP + standalone-config-sync, or autoscale to execute command as super admin via crafted HA packets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126263 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-11-11 | 9.4 Critical |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.6 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126255 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortipam | 2026-11-11 | 7.4 High |
| A path traversal: '../filedir' vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.12, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.13, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication via specially crafted credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126254 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2026-11-11 | 9.6 Critical |
| A numeric truncation error vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.12, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.13 may allow a configured ibgp neighbor to send malicious/malformed attributes to all connected routers via a specially crafted request | ||||
| CVE-2026-126258 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2026-11-11 | 7.1 High |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0, FortiOS 7.6.7 may allow an unauthenticated attacker with wad port access to crash proxy or ZTNA sessions via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126257 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 9 Critical |
| A use of hard-coded password vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass credential validation in certain circumstances outside of the attacker's control and gain unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126253 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2026-11-11 | 9.3 Critical |
| A authentication bypass by primary weakness vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.12, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.13 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to broadcast LSA via specially crafted request | ||||
| CVE-2026-126252 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 8.3 High |
| A improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http requests | ||||
| CVE-2026-126251 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126250 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 8.2 High |
| A incorrect authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service via HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126248 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 7.5 High |
| A insufficiently protected credentials vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information via HTTPS requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126246 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 7.5 High |
| A null pointer dereference vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform a denial of service attack via http requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126249 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 7.2 High |
| A improper privilege management vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated attacker to escalate privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126247 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-11 | 7.2 High |
| A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0 through 8.0.3, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.10 may allow an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via http requests. | ||||