Export limit exceeded: 424742 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424742 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424742 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 424742 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (424742 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-16135 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| The VibeBP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.9.8.1. This is due to the plugin allowing arbitrary user meta updates through the set_email_notification_settings() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to grant themselves administrator privileges by updating their own 'wp_capabilities' user meta value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2982 | 2026-11-12 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The WP Table Builder – Drag & Drop Table Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'url' parameter in versions up to, and including, 2.1.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level permissions and higher, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Exploitation by lower-privileged users requires an administrator to explicitly allow those roles in plugin settings. While it is possible to assign subscriber-level roles with the ability to create tables, such privileges are usually assigned to the more appropriate contributor, author, or editor level roles. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15309 | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High | ||
| The CourseCure Courses plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in versions up to, and including, 1.5.1. This is due to a missing capability check in the ajax_save_settings() function, which accepts arbitrary POST parameters and calls update_option() with attacker-controlled keys and values without any authorization verification. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to elevate their privileges to administrator by setting the default_role WordPress option to 'administrator' and users_can_register to '1', then registering a new account that is automatically granted full administrator access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119235 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| proxygen's QPACK decoder enforced its size limit on a string literal in an encoder-stream instruction only after the entire literal had been received. A remote, unauthenticated HTTP/3 peer could send an insert instruction on the QPACK encoder stream that declares an arbitrarily large literal and then keep sending data, causing the decoder to buffer it without bound for the lifetime of the connection and exhaust memory, leading to denial of service. The issue occurs regardless of the advertised QPACK dynamic table capacity, including when the dynamic table is disabled. This issue affects proxygen versions prior to v2026.11.09.00. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119723 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| When parsing request variables such as query-string and form parameters, HHVM did not check that appending a nested array succeeded before descending into it. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could send a GET or POST request which would crash the HHVM server process before any application code runs, leading to denial of service. This issue affected HHVM prior to 23c061f4e804a51badd5f85227e65185651253b5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119055 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| CWE- 416: Use After Free vulnerability exists that could cause arbitrary code execution when a local attacker could trick the end user to open a specially crafted malicious SSD file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119944 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Mobile Device Management allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119948 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Active Directory allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119950 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Print Spooler Components allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119951 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2016 (server Core Installation), Windows Server 2019 and 4 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.1 High |
| Use after free in Windows Deployment Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119954 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 17 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| Absolute path traversal in Microsoft Windows Search Component allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118713 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 8 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118717 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 8 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118722 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2024 and 8 more | 2026-11-12 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126644 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-11-12 | 3.9 Low |
| A link-following flaw was found in the authorized_key module of the ansible.posix collection, residual to the fix for CVE-2026-11837. That fix guards only the final path component (os.chown with follow_symlinks=False and O_NOFOLLOW in _safe_open_write()). When an unprivileged local user replaces their ~/.ssh directory with a symlink to a directory they do not own, and an operator subsequently runs the authorized_key task as root (a common provisioning pattern), the module resolves its path operations through the symlink: atomic_move() writes the temporary file in the symlink target and renames it to <target>/authorized_keys, creating or overwriting a file in the attacker-chosen directory, and os.chmod(sshdir, 0o700) follows the symlink and changes the target directory's permissions. The written file is chowned to the unprivileged user, so this is not a privilege escalation, but it allows an attacker to create or overwrite files (for example in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/, which APT reads regardless of file ownership) to cause integrity and availability impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126643 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-11-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| A cleartext storage flaw was found in the AAP Gateway Operator. When reconciling an AutomationController, the operator reads the protected resource-server Secret (Secret/<aap-name>-resource-server, key controller_resource_server_secret) and copies its plaintext value into the generated AutomationController custom resource under spec.extra_settings (RESOURCE_SERVER.SECRET_KEY). Although the operator uses no_log to keep the value out of its own logs, serializing it into the custom resource exposes it to any principal able to read the AutomationController CR without permission to read the backing Kubernetes Secret, breaking the expected OpenShift RBAC separation between the two resources. The value may also propagate into Kubernetes API/etcd storage, GitOps and Argo diffs and history, rendered manifests, support bundles, and audit data. The resource-server secret is intended for trusted Gateway-to-Controller service authentication, and its disclosure may allow a user to impersonate a trusted Controller service and reach privileged service-index APIs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126641 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-11-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| A host key verification flaw was found in ansible-pylibssh and in the ansible.netcommon libssh connection plugin. When trust-on-first-use is enabled (host_key_auto_add on the libssh connection plugin, or AutoAddPolicy in ansible-pylibssh), a host that is already present in known_hosts but now presents a different key is accepted without warning. The pylibssh Session.verify_knownhost() method passes the SSH_KNOWN_HOSTS_CHANGED and SSH_KNOWN_HOSTS_OTHER states to the same missing_host_key() policy hook used for unknown hosts, and the bundled AutoAddPolicy/RejectPolicy classes (as well as ansible.netcommon's MyAddPolicy, which is modeled on paramiko's AutoAddPolicy) therefore add the changed key and continue the connection rather than aborting as paramiko's BadHostKeyException path would. As a result the controller authenticates to the substitute host, runs the play there, and appends the new key to known_hosts, which can disclose connection credentials to an attacker performing a machine-in-the-middle attack. Default configurations (host_key_checking enabled, host_key_auto_add unset) are not affected; non-interactive runs fail closed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-123765 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Apache Sling XSS. xssAPI.getStyleToken() accepts markup in unquoted urls. This issue affects Apache Sling XSS: before 2.4.14. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.14, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119826 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 10 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Windows Hyper-V allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114369 | 1 Qt | 2 Qt, Qtwebsockets | 2026-11-12 | N/A |
| Resource exhaustion vulnerability in the Qt Framework QWebSocket and QWebSocketServer classes of the Qt WebSockets module | ||||