Export limit exceeded: 420527 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 420527 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (420527 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-8355 | 1 Ibm | 3 Contextforge, Contextforge-mcp-gateway, Contextforge Mcp Gateway | 2026-11-06 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 0.1.0 through 1.0.5 is vulnerable to a server-side request Forgery (SSRF) that allows authenticated users with gateway creation privileges to perform arbitrary HTTP POST requests to internal network resources and cloud metadata endpoints. The vulnerability occurs during OAuth-enabled gateway registration when the system fails to validate the oauth_config.token_url parameter. When registering a gateway with OAuth client credentials authentication, an attacker can supply a malicious token_url pointing to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints (AWS IMDSv1, GCP, Azure), or localhost-bound services. The application immediately performs an HTTP POST request to the attacker-controlled URL with form-encoded credentials in the body. If the response cannot be parsed as a valid OAuth token response, up to 256 characters of the response body are reflected back to the attacker in the HTTP 502 error message. This vulnerability bypasses existing SSRF protections that are applied to the gateway.url field but not to OAuth configuration parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3234 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Mod Proxy Cluster, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services | 2026-11-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in mod_proxy_cluster. This vulnerability, a Carriage Return Line Feed (CRLF) injection in the decodeenc() function, allows a remote attacker to bypass input validation. By injecting CRLF sequences into the cluster configuration, an attacker can corrupt the response body of INFO endpoint responses. Exploitation requires network access to the MCMP protocol port, but no authentication is needed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3184 | 3 Kernel, Linux, Redhat | 7 Util-linux, Util-linux, Enterprise Linux and 4 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in util-linux. Improper hostname canonicalization in the `login(1)` utility, when invoked with the `-h` option, can modify the supplied remote hostname before setting `PAM_RHOST`. A remote attacker could exploit this by providing a specially crafted hostname, potentially bypassing host-based Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM) access control rules that rely on fully qualified domain names. This could lead to unauthorized access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28295 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Els | 2026-11-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the FTP GVfs backend. A malicious FTP server can exploit this vulnerability by providing an arbitrary IP address and port in its passive mode (PASV) response. The client unconditionally trusts this information and attempts to connect to the specified endpoint, allowing the malicious server to probe for open ports accessible from the client's network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2340 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 11 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Openshift and 8 more | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s vfs_worm module. The module is intended to provide write-once, read-many (WORM) protections by preventing modification of files after a configurable grace period. Due to insufficient validation during rename operations, an authenticated user with write access to a share could overwrite a protected file by renaming a newly created file over the existing WORM-protected file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2708 | 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat | 4 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-11-06 | 3.7 Low |
| A request smuggling vulnerability exists in libsoup's HTTP/1 header parsing logic. The soup_message_headers_append_common() function in libsoup/soup-message-headers.c unconditionally appends each header value without validating for duplicate or conflicting Content-Length fields. This allows an attacker to send HTTP requests containing multiple Content-Length headers with differing values. | ||||
| CVE-2019-7907 | 2026-11-06 | N/A | ||
| Reserved 2019 Magento 1 ID with no published record. Linked to VULN-9633 but never published; left REJECTED after the 2026-11-06 review of wrongly rejected IDs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35549 | 1 Mariadb | 1 Mariadb | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in MariaDB Server before 11.4.10, 11.5.x through 11.8.x before 11.8.6, and 12.x before 12.2.2. If the caching_sha2_password authentication plugin is installed, and some user accounts are configured to use it, a large packet can crash the server because sha256_crypt_r uses alloca. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122193 | 1 Aws | 1 Trusted-remote-execution | 2026-11-06 | 9.9 Critical |
| OS command injection in the example SSM document provisioning script in Trusted Remote Execution (REX) before 2026-07-28 might allow an authenticated remote user who is permitted to invoke the Rex-RO or Rex-RW SSM document to execute arbitrary commands as root on the managed instance, bypassing Cedar policy enforcement. To remediate this issue, users should delete any Rex-RO and Rex-RW SSM documents created from the example script, in each account and Region where it was run. | ||||
| CVE-2026-116767 | 1 Absolute | 1 Secure Access | 2026-11-06 | N/A |
| CVE-2026-116767 is an improper input handling vulnerability in Secure Access servers prior to 14.61. Authenticated attackers can cause a persistent denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114232 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 5 Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.4, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 2 more | 2026-11-06 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in the UserManagedPermissionService of the Keycloak authorization server. The UMA Protection API, which manages user permissions, fails to validate the resourceType field when a user creates a new policy. This allows an attacker to create a policy that applies to resources owned by other users, potentially leading to unauthorized access or modification of sensitive data across the entire realm. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110932 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 5 Red Hat Build Of Keycloak 26.4, Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak and 2 more | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in the theme resource endpoint of Keycloak, an open-source identity and access management solution. The issue occurs because the server fails to validate theme names before using them as keys for an on-disk gzip cache. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this by sending many requests with unique, fabricated theme names, leading to persistent disk space exhaustion that survives server restarts and causes service disruptions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44277 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiauthenticator | 2026-11-06 | 9.1 Critical |
| A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 8.0.2, FortiAuthenticator 8.0.0, FortiAuthenticator 6.6.0 through 6.6.8, FortiAuthenticator 6.5.0 through 6.5.6, FortiAuthenticator 6.4.0 through 6.4.10 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118395 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 7.5 High |
| Gitea 1.27.3 stopped personal access tokens restricted to public resources (`public-only`) from creating repositories through `POST /api/v1/user/repos` and `POST /api/v1/repos/migrate`, but `POST /api/v1/org/{org}/repos`, `POST /api/v1/orgs/{org}/repos`, `POST /api/v1/orgs` and `POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/generate` still accepted such tokens. A holder of a public-only token with the needed write scopes could create private repositories in organizations where the token's owner may create repositories, create private organizations, and generate private repositories from templates. The token still could not read the private repositories it created. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118504 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea | 2026-11-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| The web interface blocks issue and pull request changes on archived repositories, but several issue routes of the REST API did not check whether the repository is archived. A user allowed to change issues of an archived repository could use the API to edit, close or delete issues, change labels and deadlines, add or delete tracked time and stopwatches, add reactions, change issue blocks, and pin issues, altering data that archiving is meant to freeze. Gitea 28.2.0 added the check to the issue edit, delete and label routes; Gitea 28.3.0 applies it to all modifying repository API requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-123833 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Intellij Idea | 2026-11-06 | 3.6 Low |
| In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 database connections could be established in untrusted projects | ||||
| CVE-2026-123836 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Datalore | 2026-11-06 | 8.8 High |
| In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 workspace collaborators could obtain the owner's SSH private key via Git backup | ||||
| CVE-2026-123837 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Intellij Idea | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.1 command injection was possible in untrusted projects via Tomcat run configurations on WSL | ||||
| CVE-2026-123838 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Intellij Idea | 2026-11-06 | 7.8 High |
| In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via UI Designer form file | ||||
| CVE-2026-123842 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Intellij Idea | 2026-11-06 | 7.1 High |
| In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 arbitrary file write was possible via symlinks when extracting plugin archives | ||||