Export limit exceeded: 425648 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425648 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425648 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425648 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425648 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425648 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425648 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 425648 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (425648 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-124648 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Ti Woocommerce Wishlist | 2026-11-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| The TI WooCommerce Wishlist WordPress plugin before 2.13.0 does not verify that a visitor who is not logged in owns a registered user's wishlist before letting them manage it, allowing unauthenticated users who know or guess a wishlist's share key to delete items from other customers' wishlists. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110003 | 1 Payara | 1 Payara Server | 2026-11-12 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the administration REST interface of Azul Payara allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to bypass secure-admin remote-access restrictions by supplying an arbitrary value in the X-GlassFish-authToken HTTP header. The header's presence waives the remote-rejection check before the token is validated, and an invalid token falls through to password-based authentication, which succeeds without credentials on default domains configured with an empty administrative password. Successful exploitation grants execution of arbitrary administrative commands, equivalent to complete compromise of the server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-123765 | 1 Apache | 1 Sling Xss | 2026-11-12 | N/A |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Apache Sling XSS. xssAPI.getStyleToken() accepts markup in unquoted urls. This issue affects Apache Sling XSS: before 2.4.14. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.14, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64460 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-12 | 7 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PCI/IOV: Skip VF Resizable BAR restore on read error sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() uses the VF Resizable BAR Control register to decide how many VF BARs to restore (nbars) and which VF BAR each iteration addresses (bar_idx). bar_idx indexes into dev->sriov->barsz[], which has only PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS (6) entries. When a device does not respond, config reads typically return PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0). Both fields are 3 bits wide, so nbars and bar_idx both evaluate to 7. The barsz[] access then goes out of bounds. UBSAN reports this as: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/pci/iov.c:948:51 index 7 is out of range for type 'resource_size_t [6]' Observed on an NVIDIA RTX PRO 1000 GPU (GB207GLM) that stopped responding during a failed GC6 power state exit. The subsequent pci_restore_state() invoked sriov_restore_vf_rebar_state() while config reads returned 0xffffffff, triggering the splat. Bail out if any VF Resizable BAR Control read returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE. No further VF BARs are touched, which is safe because a config read that returns PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE indicates the device is unreachable and restoration is pointless. This mirrors the guard in pci_restore_rebar_state(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-64506 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-11-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtw89: correct drop logic for malformed AMPDU frames The previous commit aims to fix issue caused by malformed AMPDU frames. But the drop logic fails to deal with the first AMPDU packet paired with certain range of sequence number, and leads to unexpected packet drop. It is more likely to encounter this failure when there are busy traffic during rekey process and could lead to disconnection from the AP. Fix this by adding a initial state judgement and only reset status during pairwise rekey. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40670 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| Improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) could allow a privileged attacker to potentially overlap MMIO regions with DRAM regions resulting in loss of integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40669 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| An off-by-one error in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow an attacker with hypervisor access to corrupt the Reverse Map Table (RMP) table, potentially resulting in loss of guest memory integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40668 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| Authentication bypass by spoofing in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to request attestation reports for VMPL 0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28249 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| Improper preservation of consistency between independent representations of shared state in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to potentially affect cache coherency for guest context pages resulting in loss of integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28247 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Regions in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to change the encryption bit for guest context pages potentially resulting in loss of integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28248 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| Improper enforcement of behavioral workflow in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to potentially launch a guest whose attestation report contains an ID key digest for an ID block that doesn't match the guest's measurement resulting in loss of integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-126261 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimanager | 2026-11-12 | 9 Critical |
| A improper authorization vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 8.0.0, FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.7, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, FortiManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.8 may allow an unauthenticated attacker that can reach the FGFM port to execute code or commands via crafted FGFM packets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122165 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Client for NFS allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122166 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Desktop Services allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122169 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| Insufficient granularity of access control in Windows IKE Extension allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122170 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7 High |
| Use after free in Windows Win32K allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122173 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 6.8 Medium |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in HID Parser Library allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-122177 | 1 Microsoft | 23 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 20 more | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in Windows iSCSI allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111239 | 2026-11-12 | N/A | ||
| The optional SSH administration service grants full access to the administration shell to every user that authenticates against its configured login domain, without checking for an administrative role. An attacker holding the credentials of any user in that domain, including a low-privileged application user, can execute arbitrary code as the server process. Users are recommended to disable the SSH administration service, or to block network access to it from untrusted clients and restrict its login domain to administrative users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121371 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2026-11-12 | 7.5 High |
| On affected EOS versions with the eAPI service enabled, a specially crafted HTTP request can allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to read arbitrary files, including sensitive credentials from the switch filesystem. | ||||