Export limit exceeded: 419022 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (419022 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-8904 | 1 Amazon | 1 Emr | 2026-11-04 | 8.5 High |
| Amazon EMR Secret Agent creates a keytab file containing Kerberos credentials. This file is stored in the /tmp/ directory. A user with access to this directory and another account can potentially decrypt the keys and escalate to higher privileges. Users are advised to upgrade to Amazon EMR version 7.5 or higher. For Amazon EMR releases between 6.10 and 7.4, we strongly recommend that you run the bootstrap script and RPM files with the fix provided in the location below. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8405 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-11-04 | 7.7 High |
| GitLab has remediated a security issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 17.1 before 18.4.6, 18.5 before 18.5.4, and 18.6 before 18.6.2 that could have allowed an authenticated user to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of other users by injecting malicious HTML into vulnerability code flow displays. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8309 | 1 Manageengine | 3 Assetexplorer, Servicedesk Plus, Supportcenter Plus | 2026-11-04 | 8.1 High |
| There is an improper privilege management vulnerability identified in ManageEngine's Asset Explorer, ServiceDesk Plus, ServiceDesk Plus MSP, and SupportCenter Plus products by Zohocorp. This vulnerability impacts Asset Explorer versions before 7710, ServiceDesk Plus versions before 15110, ServiceDesk Plus MSP versions before 14940, and SupportCenter Plus versions before 14940. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68596 | 2 Bitapps, Wordpress | 2 Bit Assist, Wordpress | 2026-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Bit Apps Bit Assist bit-assist allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Bit Assist: from n/a through <= 1.5.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-121598 | 1 Totolink | 1 A950rg Firmware | 2026-11-04 | 9.9 Critical |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK A950RG 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104. This impacts the function strcpy of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Basic Wireless Configuration Handler. The manipulation of the argument wepkey leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68586 | 2 Goratech, Wordpress | 2 Cooked, Wordpress | 2026-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Gora Tech Cooked cooked allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Cooked: from n/a through <= 1.11.3. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112421 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-11-04 | 4.7 Medium |
| A race condition was addressed with improved handling of symbolic links. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to modify protected parts of the file system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112505 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-11-04 | 7.8 High |
| An out-of-bounds write issue was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. A malicious Screen Sharing peer may be able to corrupt process memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-112529 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| An out-of-bounds read was addressed with improved bounds checking. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59046 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-04 | 6.2 Medium |
| In __pkvm_guest_relinquish_to_host of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-120988 | 1 Naver | 1 Billboard.js | 2026-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| billboard.js before 4.1.3 allows an attacker to execute malicious JavaScript due to improper sanitization of series ids during legend template rendering. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63475 | 2026-11-04 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| isomorphic-git is a pure JavaScript implementation of Git for Node.js and browsers. Prior to 1.38.6, isomorphic-git persists server-supplied circular symref= capabilities through updateRemoteRefs, and GitRefManager.resolve() follows the resulting loose symbolic references without a default depth limit or cycle detection. After a clone from a malicious or man-in-the-middle-controlled remote, operations such as log, status, checkout, and branch that resolve refs/remotes/origin/a or refs/remotes/origin/b do not terminate. The circular references remain on disk, leaving the repository unusable for the application and causing a persistent denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.38.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63395 | 2026-11-04 | 8.8 High | ||
| isomorphic-git is a pure JavaScript implementation of Git for Node.js and browsers. Prior to 1.38.6, isomorphic-git's git.checkout writes new child paths through symlinked leading directory components without checking them. A malicious repository can first place a directory symlink and later replace the tree state with a child file beneath that path; the usual trigger is a clone followed by a later pull, while a single clone can trigger the issue when a symlink already exists or the consuming application accesses the tree. With Node fs on Linux or macOS, the operating system can resolve the write outside the working tree, permitting arbitrary host file writes and possible code execution. Node fs on Windows usually blocks the symlink plant without additional privilege, and browser or in-memory providers limit impact to their virtual filesystem and are affected only when they implement symlink creation and following. This issue is fixed in version 1.38.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95731 | 2026-11-04 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Hardcoded password vulnerabilities in the command-line interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access the affected system using hardcoded credentials. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access to the affected system with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95732 | 2026-11-04 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95733 | 2026-11-04 | 9.6 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability exists in a component of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95735 | 2026-11-04 | 8.7 High | ||
| An improper certificate validation vulnerability exists in HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker, under certain preconditions outside the attacker's control, to obtain sensitive information, including credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95736 | 2026-11-04 | 8.3 High | ||
| Improper certificate validation vulnerabilities exist in the affected interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer, which could be exploited by an unauthenticated adjacent attacker if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to intercept sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95737 | 2026-11-04 | 8.2 High | ||
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow a local attacker with high privileges to gain elevated privileges on the underlying host operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95738 | 2026-11-04 | 8.1 High | ||
| Authentication bypass vulnerabilities in the affected interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to circumvent existing authentication controls if certain preconditions outside of the attacker's control are met. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain administrative access to the affected system. | ||||