Export limit exceeded: 417704 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 417704 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4471 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-9869 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formTR069Config functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9817 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formUploadFile functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9660 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple exploitable stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formFilter functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability deals with the vpnPassword parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42026 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple exploitable stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup dhcp_dns functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the dhcp_dns2 parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42024 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup static network configuration functionality of Totolink X2000R TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the static_gw parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42023 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup static network configuration functionality of Totolink X2000R TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the static_ipv6 parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42022 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup static network configuration functionality of Totolink X2000R TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the static_dns2 parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42021 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the boa formIpv6Setup static network configuration functionality of Totolink X2000R TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger these vulnerabilities. This vulnerability concerns the static_dns1 parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10139 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Mcli functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10137 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formUpload() functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10133 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the batchupg functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10132 | 1 Totolink | 1 X2000r | 2026-10-23 | 9.1 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the boa formIpQos mac functionality of X2000R (version(s): TOTOLINK-X2000R-Gh-V1.0.0-B20250421.1327). A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-115863 | 1 Connman | 1 Connman | 2026-10-23 | 7.6 High |
| ConnMan through 2.0 has a stack-based buffer overflow via a DHCPv6 Reply message. This occurs in get_domains in gdhcp/client.c. It copies a fixed NS_MAXDNAME (1025) bytes from a DHCPv6 DOMAIN_LIST (option 24) value into a 1026-byte stack buffer dns_name regardless of the actual option length, then walks DNS labels with an unbounded "c += jump + 1" loop. A crafted DHCPv6 REPLY with a DOMAIN_LIST option of >= 1025 non-zero bytes makes the label walk leave the buffer and read/write '.' past its end in attacker-chosen strides. An on-link attacker can trigger this without authentication via a forged Router Advertisement (O=1) and a forged DHCPv6 REPLY matching xid/CLIENTID with a long DOMAIN_LIST. The impact is unauthenticated on-link crash of connmand (runs as root). This was introduced in bb06c47. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108431 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021 and 8 more | 2026-10-23 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88083 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Microsoft Sql Server 2022 (gdr), Microsoft Sql Server 2022 For X64-based Systems \(cu27\), Microsoft Sql Server 2025 For X64-based Systems (gdr) and 3 more | 2026-10-23 | 7.5 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in SQL Server allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108445 | 1 Microsoft | 11 365 Apps, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Office Ltsc 2021 and 8 more | 2026-10-23 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96248 | 1 Microsoft | 9 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2016 and 6 more | 2026-10-23 | 7.5 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Host Guardian Service allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70024 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-23 | 9.8 Critical |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Internet Information Services allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87711 | 1 Microsoft | 28 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 25 more | 2026-10-23 | 7.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12665 | 1 Ibm | 3 Mq Advanced Container Images, Mq Operator, Supplied Mq Advanced Container Images | 2026-10-23 | 8.1 High |
| IBM MQ could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack buffer overflow when processing TLS certificates with malformed distinguished names during channel connection establishment. | ||||