Search

Search Results (425856 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-86811 2026-11-10 N/A
The stateful session bean passivation mechanism derives the on-disk file name from a client-supplied identifier without validating it. A remote attacker with access to the remote EJB service can cause session state to be read from or written to files outside the passivation directory. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.3.0 or 11.0.0-M2, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-86532 2026-11-10 N/A
The bundled JAAS login modules leak whether a username exists and compare credentials in a non-constant-time manner. A remote unauthenticated attacker can enumerate valid accounts and may infer credential material through timing analysis. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.3.0 or 11.0.0-M2, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-123082 1 Docker 1 Desktop 2026-11-10 N/A
Docker Desktop before version 4.94.0 could write the signed-in user's Docker Hub access token (a JWT) in cleartext to application logs and diagnostics bundles. IPC payloads that were bare JSON strings or arrays were not redacted before logging, and a Docker Desktop component logged the token when it requested it from the backend. An attacker with read access to these files could obtain the token and use it to read and modify the user's Docker Hub data as that user while the token remains valid. Docker Desktop 4.94.0 redacts these payloads. The fix does not rewrite logs written by earlier versions, which can still contain tokens after upgrading.
CVE-2024-5535 5 Debian, Netapp, Openssl and 2 more 72 Debian Linux, 500f, 500f Firmware and 69 more 2026-11-10 9.1 Critical
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.
CVE-2026-89142 1 Airoha Technology 1 Wi-fi Npu Fw 2026-11-10 6.3 Medium
In the Wi-Fi NPU FW, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with user execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2026-71881 1 Gbif 1 Integrated Publishing Toolkit 2026-11-10 N/A
Multiple injection issues in resource metadata fields in GBIF Integrated Publishing Toolkit versions before 3.3.5 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute code in another user's session after user interaction via stored cross-site scripting
CVE-2026-68984 1 Samsung Semiconductor 10 Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1480 and 7 more 2026-11-10 8.1 High
In the Samsung Exynos NPU kernel driver, an integer overflow allows an unprivileged application to trigger memory corruption.
CVE-2026-63774 1 Subnet Solutions 2 Powersystem Center 2024, Powersystem Center 2026 2026-11-10 9 Critical
Insufficient input validation in the PowerSYSTEM Center report designer allows an authenticated user to execute unauthorized SQL commands.
CVE-2026-63017 1 Subnet Solutions 3 Powersystem Center 2020, Powersystem Center 2024, Powersystem Center 2026 2026-11-10 9 Critical
Incorrect authorization in PowerSYSTEM Center allows a low-privileged, authenticated user to access resources normally limited to administrators.
CVE-2026-33972 1 Samsung Semiconductor 5 Exynos 1080, Exynos 9110, Exynos Modem 5123 and 2 more 2026-11-10 9.8 Critical
In the Exynos modem's IMS stack, Out of Bound access occurs due to improper validation.
CVE-2026-123776 2026-11-10 9.8 Critical
RRD::CGI::Image versions through 0.01 for Perl pass CGI query parameters containting "tz" to tzset(), , so a FIFO or device path blocks the CGI process. The normalize_params method sends any query key matching /tz/i to tz(), which sets $ENV{TZ} to that value, with no validation. It then calls tzset(). glibc treats a TZ value starting with / or : as a file path and opens it, so a value naming a FIFO or a blocking device stalls the process inside tzset().
CVE-2026-123029 1 Wowza 1 Streaming Engine 2026-11-10 7.5 High
Wowza Streaming Engine before 4.12.2 processes XML external entities, which allows remote attackers to read local files with the privileges of the Wowza Streaming Engine process.
CVE-2026-123025 1 Opnsense 1 Os-acme-client 2026-11-10 N/A
An OS Command Injection vulnerability was discovered in the Google Cloud DNS validation module of the OPNsense os-acme-client plugin through 4.17. The DnsGcloud::prepare() method decodes the dns_gcloud_key model field and directly interpolates the string fields gcloud_account and gcloud_project into a shell command passed to proc_open() via LeUtils::run_shell_command() without any validation or escaping. A remote authenticated user with privileges to issue or renew certificates through the WebGUI/API can achieve arbitrary code execution as root.
CVE-2026-123017 1 Godotsteam 1 Godotsteam 2026-11-10 6.5 Medium
GodotSteam 4.17 through 4.23.2 trusts the peer value of 1 to mean that a player is the server. A grant_gold(1000000) call can be forged.
CVE-2026-123014 1 Iterm2 1 Iterm2 2026-11-10 N/A
iTerm2 before 3.7.7beta2 has an argument injection vulnerability in the x-man-page: URL handler, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the logged-in user by inducing the user to open a crafted URL in iTerm2. Percent-encoded NUL characters survive input sanitization and are subsequently converted to whitespace during command-line parsing, allowing injection of additional arguments to /usr/bin/man. An attacker can inject the -P option to select an attacker-controlled pager command. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-46321.
CVE-2026-122267 1 Chainguard 1 Minio 2026-11-10 N/A
MinIO Signature V4 verification before RELEASE.2026-09-22T19-25-18Z accepts unsigned x-amz-* headers, letting a presigned PUT URL be escalated into a cross-bucket read.
CVE-2026-121008 2026-11-10 5.4 Medium
SQL::Abstract::Tree versions before 2.000001_04 for Perl allow cross-site scripting via unescaped SQL text and bind values in the html profile. The html profile wraps keywords and placeholders in span elements and breaks lines with br elements, so its output is meant to go into a page as is. The format method does not HTML-escape the SQL text or the bind values it fills in around that markup. An application that renders SQL formatted with the html profile, such as in a debug panel or query log, allows an attacker who controls a bind value or part of the SQL text to embed JavaScript in the page.
CVE-2026-120399 1 Redhat 1 Edge Manager 2026-11-10 7.5 High
A flaw was found in flightctl. A TLS handshake is performed synchronously in the HTTP server’s connection-context callback without a deadline. A network-reachable unauthenticated client can stall the handshake and prevent the affected listener from accepting new connections.
CVE-2026-119433 1 Foxitsoftware 1 Foxit Workspace 2026-11-10 7.7 High
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in an undocumented API endpoint of Foxit Workspace due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URL and network parameters. A remote attacker could exploit this issue to induce the server to send requests to arbitrary internal or external resources, potentially enabling unauthorized access to internal services, network reconnaissance, and sensitive information disclosure.
CVE-2026-119432 1 Foxitsoftware 1 Foxit Workspace 2026-11-10 8.7 High
A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Foxit Workspace's file share preview functionality. An attacker could upload a crafted file and share it with a victim. When the victim opens or previews the file, the embedded script executes in the application's origin, potentially accessing locally stored credentials and enabling credential theft.