Export limit exceeded: 419899 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1543 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-8716 | 1 Opentext | 1 Content Management | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| In Content Management versions 20.4- 25.3 authenticated attackers may exploit a complex cache poisoning technique to download unprotected files from the server if the filenames are known. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9998 | 1 Arcinfo | 1 Pcvue | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| The sequence of packets received by a Networking server are not correctly checked. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to send specially crafted messages to force the application to stop. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37779 | 1 Woodwing Elvis Dam | 1 Woodwing Elvis Dam | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| WoodWing Elvis DAM v6.98.1 was discovered to contain an authenticated remote command execution (RCE) vulnerability via the Apache Ant script functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12387 | 1 Pix-link | 1 Lv-wr21q | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Pix-Link LV-WR21Q router's language module allows remote attackers to trigger a denial of service (DoS) by sending a specially crafted HTTP POST request containing non-existing language parameter. This renders the server unable to serve correct lang.js file, which causes administrator panel to not work, resulting in DoS until the language settings is reverted to a correct value. The Denial of Service affects only the administrator panel and does not affect other router functionalities. The vendor was notified early about this vulnerability, but didn't respond with the details of vulnerability or vulnerable version range. Only version V108_108 was tested and confirmed as vulnerable, other versions were not tested and might also be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28910 | 2026-04-15 | 8 High | ||
| A specific flaw exists within the Bluetooth stack of the MIB3 infotainment system. The issue results from the disabled abortion flag eventually leading to bypassing assertion functions. The vulnerability was originally discovered in Skoda Superb III car with MIB3 infotainment unit OEM part number 3V0035820. The list of affected MIB3 OEM part numbers is provided in the referenced resources. | ||||
| CVE-2025-35992 | 1 Intel | 1 Npu Drivers | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| Improper conditions check in some firmware for some Intel(R) NPU Drivers within Ring 1: Device Drivers may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52504 | 1 Siemens | 1 Siprotec 4 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 4 6MD61 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 6MD63 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 6MD66 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 6MD665 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7SA522 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7SA6 (All versions < V4.78), SIPROTEC 4 7SD5 (All versions < V4.78), SIPROTEC 4 7SD610 (All versions < V4.78), SIPROTEC 4 7SJ61 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7SJ62 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7SJ63 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7SJ64 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7SJ66 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7SS52 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7ST6 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7UM61 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7UM62 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7UT612 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7UT613 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7UT63 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7VE6 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7VK61 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 7VU683 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 Compact 7RW80 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 Compact 7SD80 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 Compact 7SJ80 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 Compact 7SJ81 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 Compact 7SK80 (All versions), SIPROTEC 4 Compact 7SK81 (All versions). Affected devices do not properly handle interrupted operations of file transfer. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial of service condition. To restore normal operations, the devices need to be restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46733 | 2026-04-15 | 7.9 High | ||
| OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. In version 4.5.0, using a specially crafted tee-supplicant binary running in REE userspace, an attacker can trigger a panic in a TA that uses the libutee Secure Storage API. Many functions in libutee, specifically those which make up the Secure Storage API, will panic if a system call returns an unexpected return code. This behavior is mandated by the TEE Internal Core API specification. However, in OP-TEE’s implementation, return codes of secure storage operations are passed through unsanitized from the REE tee-supplicant, through the Linux kernel tee-driver, through the OP-TEE kernel, back to libutee. Thus, an attacker with access to REE userspace, and the ability to stop tee-supplicant and replace it with their own process (generally trivial for a root user, and depending on the way permissions are set up, potentially available even to less privileged users) can run a malicious tee-supplicant process that responds to storage requests with unexpected response codes, triggering a panic in the requesting TA. This is particularly dangerous for TAs built with `TA_FLAG_SINGLE_INSTANCE` (corresponding to `gpd.ta.singleInstance` and `TA_FLAG_INSTANCE_KEEP_ALIVE` (corresponding to `gpd.ta.keepAlive`). The behavior of these TAs may depend on memory that is preserved between sessions, and the ability of an attacker to panic the TA and reload it with a clean memory space can compromise the behavior of those TAs. A critical example of this is the optee_ftpm TA. It uses the kept alive memory to hold PCR values, which crucially must be non-resettable. An attacker who can trigger a panic in the fTPM TA can reset the PCRs, and then extend them PCRs with whatever they choose, falsifying boot measurements, accessing sealed data, and potentially more. The impact of this issue depends significantly on the behavior of affected TAs. For some, it could manifest as a denial of service, while for others, like the fTPM TA, it can result in the disclosure of sensitive data. Anyone running the fTPM TA is affected, but similar attacks may be possible on other TAs that leverage the Secure Storage API. A fix is available in commit 941a58d78c99c4754fbd4ec3079ec9e1d596af8f. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59530 | 1 Quic-go Project | 1 Quic-go | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. In versions prior to 0.49.0, 0.54.1, and 0.55.0, a misbehaving or malicious server can cause a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on the quic-go client by triggering an assertion failure, leading to a process crash. This requires no authentication and can be exploited during the handshake phase. This was observed in the wild with certain server implementations. quic-go needs to be able to handle misbehaving server implementations, including those that prematurely send a HANDSHAKE_DONE frame. Versions 0.49.0, 0.54.1, and 0.55.0 discard Initial keys when receiving a HANDSHAKE_DONE frame, thereby correctly handling premature HANDSHAKE_DONE frames. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64342 | 1 Espressif | 1 Esp-idf | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. When the ESP32 is in advertising mode, if it receives a connection request containing an invalid Access Address (AA) of 0x00000000 or 0xFFFFFFFF, advertising may stop unexpectedly. In this case, the controller may incorrectly report a connection event to the host, which can cause the application layer to assume that the device has successfully established a connection. This issue has been fixed in versions 5.5.2, 5.4.3, 5.3.5, 5.2.6, and 5.1.7. At time of publication versions 5.5.2, 5.3.5, and 5.1.7 have not been released but are fixed respectively in commits 3b95b50, e3d7042, and 75967b5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4675 | 1 Abb | 2 Webpro Snmp Card Powervalue, Webpro Snmp Card Powervalue Ul | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in ABB WebPro SNMP Card PowerValue, ABB WebPro SNMP Card PowerValue UL.This issue affects WebPro SNMP Card PowerValue: through 1.1.8.K; WebPro SNMP Card PowerValue UL: through 1.1.8.K. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41222 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM i801 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM i802 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM i803 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM M2100 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM M2200 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM M969 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS1600 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS1600F (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS1600T (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS8000 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS8000A (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS8000H (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS8000T (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GP (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900W (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS930L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS930W (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS940G (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS969 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2200 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.10.0). Affected devices do not properly handle malformed TLS handshake messages. This could allow an attacker with network access to the webserver to cause a denial of service resulting in the web server and the device to crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27408 | 2026-04-15 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| Manifest offers users a one-file micro back end. Prior to version 4.9.2, Manifest employs a weak password hashing implementation that uses SHA3 without a salt. This exposes user passwords to a higher risk of being cracked if an attacker gains access to the database. Without the use of a salt, identical passwords across multiple users will result in the same hash, making it easier for attackers to identify and exploit patterns, thereby accelerating the cracking process. Version 4.9.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10945 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Factorytalk Updater | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability exists in the affected product. The vulnerability requires a local, low privileged threat actor to replace certain files during update and exists due to a failure to perform proper security checks before installation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21503 | 2 Python Software Foundation, Redhat | 2 Black, Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Versions of the package black before 24.3.0 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via the lines_with_leading_tabs_expanded function in the strings.py file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious input that causes a denial of service. Exploiting this vulnerability is possible when running Black on untrusted input, or if you habitually put thousands of leading tab characters in your docstrings. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39691 | 1 Matrix-org | 1 Matrix-appservice-irc | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| matrix-appservice-irc is a Node.js IRC bridge for the Matrix messaging protocol. The fix for GHSA-wm4w-7h2q-3pf7 / CVE-2024-32000 included in matrix-appservice-irc 2.0.0 relied on the Matrix homeserver-provided timestamp to determine whether a user has access to the event they're replying to when determining whether or not to include a truncated version of the original event in the IRC message. Since this value is controlled by external entities, a malicious Matrix homeserver joined to a room in which a matrix-appservice-irc bridge instance (before version 2.0.1) is present can fabricate the timestamp with the intent of tricking the bridge into leaking room messages the homeserver should not have access to. matrix-appservice-irc 2.0.1 drops the reliance on `origin_server_ts` when determining whether or not an event should be visible to a user, instead tracking the event timestamps internally. As a workaround, it's possible to limit the amount of information leaked by setting a reply template that doesn't contain the original message. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0112 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Cortex Xdr Agent | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A problem with a detection mechanism in the Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR agent on Windows devices enables a user with Windows non-administrative privileges to disable the agent. This vulnerability can also be leveraged by malware to disable the Cortex XDR agent and then perform malicious activity. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28036 | 2026-04-15 | 5.6 Medium | ||
| Improper conditions check for some Intel(R) Arc™ GPU may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53432 | 1 Point Cloud Library | 1 Pcl | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| While parsing certain malformed PLY files, PCL version 1.14.1 crashes due to an uncaught std::out_of_range exception in PCLPointCloud2::at. This issue could potentially be exploited to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) attack when processing untrusted PLY files. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53884 | 2 Neuvector, Suse | 2 Neuvector, Neuvector | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| NeuVector stores user passwords and API keys using a simple, unsalted hash. This method is vulnerable to rainbow table attack (offline attack where hashes of known passwords are precomputed). | ||||