Export limit exceeded: 424664 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11105 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-0067 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Marinus Pfund, member of the AXIS OS Bug Bounty Program, has found the VAPIX API ledlimit.cgi was vulnerable for path traversal attacks allowing to list folder/file names on the local file system of the Axis device. Axis has released patched AXIS OS versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6168 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Just Custom Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several AJAX function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke this functionality intended for admin users via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This enables subscribers to manage field groups, change visibility of items among other things. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7202 | 1 Elgato | 3 Key Light, Light Strip, Ring Light | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Elgato's Key Lights and related light products allows an attacker to host a malicious webpage that remotely controlles the victim's lights. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30252 | 2026-04-15 | 2.6 Low | ||
| Livemarks is a browser extension that provides RSS feed bookmark folders. Versions of Livemarks prior to 3.7 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery. A malicious website may be able to coerce the extension to send an authenticated GET request to an arbitrary URL. An authenticated request is a request where the cookies of the browser are sent along with the request. The `subscribe.js` script uses the first parameter from the current URL location as the URL of the RSS feed to subscribe to and checks that the RSS feed is valid XML. `subscribe.js` is accessible by an attacker website due to its use in `subscribe.html`, an HTML page that is declared as a `web_accessible_resource` in `manifest.json`. This issue may lead to `Privilege Escalation`. A CSRF breaks the integrity of servers running on a private network. A user of the browser extension may have a private server with dangerous functionality, which is assumed to be safe due to network segmentation. Upon receiving an authenticated request instantiated from an attacker, this integrity is broken. Version 3.7 fixes this issue by removing subscribe.html from `web_accessible_resources`. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60535 | 1 Wallosapp | 1 Wallos | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component /endpoints/currency/currency of Wallos v4.1.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary operations via a crafted GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12634 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The Related Posts, Inline Related Posts, Contextual Related Posts, Related Content By PickPlugins plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including 2.0.59. This is due to missing nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10726 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The Friendly Functions for Welcart plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the settings update functionality. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44478 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Hive Events Rich Snippets for Google allows Exploitation of Trusted Credentials.This issue affects Events Rich Snippets for Google: from n/a through 1.8. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38776 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Martin Gibson WP GoToWebinar allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects WP GoToWebinar: from n/a through 15.7. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23597 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in TvRock 0.9t8a. If a logged-in user of TVRock accesses a specially crafted page, unintended operations may be performed. Note that the developer was unreachable, therefore, users should consider stop using TvRock 0.9t8a. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50054 | 1 Myscada | 2 Mypro Manager, Mypro Runtime | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| The back-end does not sufficiently verify the user-controlled filename parameter which makes it possible for an attacker to perform a path traversal attack and retrieve arbitrary files from the file system. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36906 | 1 P5 | 2 Fnip-4xsh, Fnip-8x16a | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted form. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15550 | 1 Birkir | 1 Prime | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger unauthorized actions against privileged users by manipulating GraphQL query parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53483 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| ArchivePage.php, UnarchivePage.php, and VoterEligibilityPage#executeClear() do not validate request methods or CSRF tokens, allowing attackers to trigger sensitive actions if an admin visits a malicious site. This issue affects Mediawiki - SecurePoll extension: from 1.39.X before 1.39.13, from 1.42.X before 1.42.7, from 1.43.X before 1.43.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66004 | 1 Libimobiledevice | 1 Libusbmuxd | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium |
| A Path Traversal vulnerability in usbmuxd allows local users to escalate to the service user.This issue affects usbmuxd: before 3ded00c9985a5108cfc7591a309f9a23d57a8cba. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50255 | 1 Bpcbt | 2 Smartvista, Smartvista Backoffice | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smartvista BackOffice SmartVista Suite 2.2.22 via crafted GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37145 | 1 Hrsale | 1 Hrsale | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| HRSALE 1.1.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to add unauthorized administrative users through the employee registration form. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML page with hidden form fields to trick authenticated administrators into creating new user accounts with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37940 | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Seraphinite Solutions Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium).This issue affects Seraphinite Accelerator (Full, premium): from n/a through 2.21.13. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12557 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Transporters.io plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7273 | 1 Kiteworks | 1 Owncloud | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| Cross site request forgery in Kiteworks OwnCloud allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge requests. If a request has no Authorization header, it is created with an empty string as value by a rewrite rule. The CSRF check is done by comparing the header value to null, meaning that the existing CSRF check is bypassed in this case. An attacker can, for example, create a new administrator account if the request is executed in the browser of an authenticated victim. | ||||