Export limit exceeded: 419506 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4102 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-54924 | 1 Schneider-electric | 2 Ecostruxure Power Monitoring Expert, Ecostruxure Power Operation With Advanced Reports | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists that could cause unauthorized access to sensitive data when an attacker sends a specially crafted document to a vulnerable endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9624 | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High | ||
| The WP All Import Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.3 due to missing SSRF protection on the pmxi_curl_download function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. On cloud platforms, it might allow attackers to read the Instance metadata. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50811 | 1 Tendcode | 1 Izone | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| hopetree izone lts c011b48 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the active push function as \\apps\\tool\\apis\\bd_push.py does not securely filter user input through push_urls() and get_urls(). | ||||
| CVE-2025-49917 | 2 Icegram, Wordpress | 2 Icegram Express, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Express Pro email-subscribers-premium allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Icegram Express Pro: from n/a through <= 5.9.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14443 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in ose-openshift-apiserver. This vulnerability allows internal network enumeration, service discovery, limited information disclosure, and potential denial-of-service (DoS) through Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to missing IP address and network-range validation when processing user-supplied image references. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13957 | 1 Abb | 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| SSRF Server Side Request Forgery vulnerabilities exist in ASPECT if administrator credentials become compromisedThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.*; NEXUS Series: through 3.*; MATRIX Series: through 3.*. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10874 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| The Orbit Fox: Duplicate Page, Menu Icons, SVG Support, Cookie Notice, Custom Fonts & More WordPress plugin before 3.0.2 does not limit URLs which may be used for the stock photo import feature, allowing the user to specify arbitrary URLs. This leads to a server-side request forgery as the user may force the server to access any URL of their choosing. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10137 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| The Snow Monkey theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 29.1.5 via the request() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52967 | 1 Lfprojects | 1 Mlflow | 2026-04-15 | 5.8 Medium |
| gateway_proxy_handler in MLflow before 3.1.0 lacks gateway_path validation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52362 | 1 Phproxy | 1 Phproxy | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the URL processing functionality of PHProxy version 1.1.1 and prior. The input validation for the _proxurl parameter can be bypassed, allowing a remote, unauthenticated attacker to submit a specially crafted URL | ||||
| CVE-2025-50251 | 1 Makeplane | 1 Plane | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Server side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in makeplane plane 0.23.1 via the password recovery. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6538 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift Console. A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack can happen if an attacker supplies all or part of a URL to the server to query. The server is considered to be in a privileged network position and can often reach exposed services that aren't readily available to clients due to network filtering. Leveraging such an attack vector, the attacker can have an impact on other services and potentially disclose information or have other nefarious effects on the system. The /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint on the OpenShift Console allows authenticated users to have the console's pod perform arbitrary and fully controlled HTTP(s) requests. The full response to these requests is returned by the endpoint. While the name of this endpoint suggests the requests are only bound to the internet, no such checks are in place. An authenticated user can therefore ask the console to perform arbitrary HTTP requests from outside the cluster to a service inside the cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57818 | 1 Firecrawl | 1 Firecrawl | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| Firecrawl turns entire websites into LLM-ready markdown or structured data. Prior to version 2.0.1, a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in Firecrawl's webhook functionality. Authenticated users could configure a webhook to an internal URL and send POST requests with arbitrary headers, which may have allowed access to internal systems. This has been fixed in version 2.0.1. If upgrading is not possible, it is recommend to isolate Firecrawl from any sensitive internal systems. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54590 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| webfinger.js is a TypeScript-based WebFinger client that runs in both browsers and Node.js environments. In versions 2.8.0 and below, the lookup function accepts user addresses for account checking. However, the ActivityPub specification requires preventing access to localhost services in production. This library does not prevent localhost access, only checking for hosts that start with "localhost" and end with a port. Users can exploit this by creating servers that send GET requests with controlled host, path, and port parameters to query services on the instance's host or local network, enabling blind SSRF attacks. This is fixed in version 2.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64252 | 2 Marcomilesi, Wordpress | 2 Anac Xml Viewer, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Marco Milesi ANAC XML Viewer anac-xml-viewer allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects ANAC XML Viewer: from n/a through <= 1.8.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51981 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing feature used during a WS-Eventing subscription SOAP operation. The attacker can control all the HTTP data sent in the SSRF connection, but the attacker can not receive any data back from this connection. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62763 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Collaboration | 2026-04-15 | 5 Medium |
| Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.12 allows SSRF because of the configuration of the chat proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36884 | 1 Brightsign | 1 Digital Signage Diagnostic Web Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| BrightSign Digital Signage Diagnostic Web Server 8.2.26 and less contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability in the 'url' GET parameter of the Download Speed Test service. Attackers can specify external domains to bypass firewalls and perform network enumeration by forcing the application to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal network hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54197 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| SAP NetWeaver Administrator(System Overview) allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate accessible HTTP endpoints in the internal network by specially crafting HTTP requests. On successful exploitation this can result in Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which could have a low impact on integrity and confidentiality of data. It has no impact on availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13796 | 1 Deco-cx | 1 Apps | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in deco-cx apps up to 0.120.1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function AnalyticsScript of the file website/loaders/analyticsScript.ts of the component Parameter Handler. Such manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 0.120.2 addresses this issue. It is suggested to upgrade the affected component. | ||||